The Problem With Donald’s Storm Clouds…

I don’t particularly care that Donald Trump had an affair with a porn star, or a Playboy playmate. I’m fully convinced he’s an adulterer, but I don’t care. It’s not because I approve of it, I don’t. It’s because it’s not my business. Melania can deal with his infidelity as she wishes. Donald Trump is my President, not my spouse.

Some of Trump’s defenders want to bring up Bill Clinton, John Edwards, and even JFK in an attempt to accuse Democrats of hypocrisy for attacking Trump for his affair (which he and they also deny) with Stormy Daniels. They’re engaging in a false narrative to defend him. The problem with Trump is not the infidelity. Just as I defend Bill Clinton’s right to be a dog, I’ll defend Trump’s. Their wives can deal with that. I have three chief issues with Trump.

  1. Campaign finance violations
  2. Threats, bullying, and coercion tactics to keep his “other women” silent
  3. His putting himself at risk for blackmail

Let’s put aside the morality arguments for a moment and talk about the real issues. John Edwards didn’t go to jail for cheating on his dying wife, he went for essentially paying off his mistress for silence during the campaign. They gave her a job. He had others make payments to her. He went to jail for that. Donald Trump had Michael Cohen pay Stormy Daniels a sum of money for silence. That sum of money exceeded the maximum donation to a campaign. This end-around to buy her silence and evade FEC reporting is illegal, just as it was for Edwards.

Stormy Daniels is accusing associates of Trump and Michael Cohen of threatening her into silence. Other accusers of his have made similar allegations. These types of tactics are illegal. They are also immoral. They put these women in compromising situations, from which they are essentially forced into his will. This is not okay.

One of the most troubling aspects of this is actually the risk to the President himself. There have been persistent rumors that the Russians have blackmail material over him (the “pee” tape, shady loans, prostitutes), which is why he won’t attack Putin or Russia by name. It appears that Michael Avenatti, Stormy’s lawyer, has some sort of DVD, or at least claims to. Presidents have immense power over public policy, but they are people. The threat of humiliation can cause them to do things not in the interest of the public. If there are pictures or videos here, it calls into question Trump’s ability to govern in ways we haven’t seen since JFK allegedly slept with an East German spy.

I don’t really care that 70 plus year old, out of shape Donald Trump is still chasing porn stars and playmates. It doesn’t matter. Clearly though, Stormy Daniels accusations do call his fitness to serve into question, and should alarm all Americans.

Math and Big Government


Bernie Sanders is a political quagmire to me. He has ideas, some of them really good, that I agree with. It’s like, what actual Democrat/liberal is against expanding access to health care through the Medicare system? No one that’s honest. What Democrat is actually against making college affordable? If you again answered no one, you’re right again. The problem with all of these ideas is two fold- costs and politics. You simply can’t spend on into forever without any regard for actually ever paying those bills. You have to have a plan to finance these big ideas, and it has to be a plan that can pass Congress. This is where politics are hard, because you see, the public doesn’t want to pay higher taxes, so they are naturally skeptical when you either come out and tell them they need to pay higher taxes, or propose lots of new government spending and claim that taxes won’t go up. A skeptical public votes out Congress, and Congress people don’t want to be voted out of office. As a result, it’s not that easy to get Congress to vote for big government plans, there are real limits to a President’s power of persuasion here. Frankly, you shouldn’t want to see your members voted out of Congress for the purpose of just passing a bill or two, as we see the repercussions of losing elections now in the era of Trump’s Republican Congress.

Anyone who just throws out big proposals, big ideas without all the details and nuance to back them up, shouldn’t be taken seriously. This goes for Paul Ryan and his magic math on the tax cuts. It went for George W. Bush’s magic war theory, that we could pay for his Middle Eastern nation building all on the credit card. It’s true now with some of the ideas that Bernie Sanders is throwing around as his agenda. It is not a sufficient answer to say “tax the rich, cut defense spending,” when talking about how you’re going to finance big plans, because we all know those things are really tough to do- if they were easy to get past Congress, Democrats would have done them long ago. Even modest tax increases on the rich and modest cuts to Defense Department spending would be met with fierce opposition, and would be very difficult to pass- let alone creating $3.2 trillion annually to give everyone Medicare. Obviously higher taxes for the rich and a re-assignment of budget priorities is needed to make these policy goals happen, and it’s worth fighting for, but don’t pretend that this can be done easily, and that it’s a very simple solution. It’s not.

I have trouble taking Senator Sanders seriously though. He called the middle-class tax cuts portion of the GOP’s tax bill good on CNN the other day. In fact, he said Congress should have made them permanent. Is that position without merit? No, not at all. At the same time as he’s saying that, and then trying to claw back his statement, one of his financing ideas for single-payer health care (Medicare for All) is a 4% premium on every household in the country- a middle-class tax increase, even if it is a good idea. These positions don’t square. Sure, households might save money on health insurance premiums that exceeds their tax increase, perhaps, but that doesn’t mean we’re not raising taxes- and that’s assuming the 4% premium on every household would cover the costs- a subject of great debate. Not everyone is going to want to pay higher taxes to finance a national health care system, even if it will make costs cheaper for them or others. That’s just political reality.

My chief beef with Bernie Sanders is not the ideas he espouses, but the lack of reality he attaches to them, while criticizing Democrats for making tough decisions to try and pass things. I think back to his disaster interview with the New York Daily News in April of 2016, during the Presidential Primaries, where he was clearly unprepared to discuss the details of his plans for the nation. What happens to the employees of the “big banks” when you break them up? Who breaks them up, and under what authority? How exactly do we finance single-payer health care and free college education? If defense cuts are part of that plan, what happens to the people who work in manufacturing defense weaponry? Here he is again, after correctly admitting that his health care plan would require a tax increase, saying a middle-class tax cut is a good idea- it’s as though no actual facts or plans matter at all here. Now, Bernie is not the first political leader in this country to propose a bunch of stuff and not have the details down, so I could give it a chance- he’d clearly have to compromise, make deals, and come to a concrete plan once in office. The problem with Bernie is that he’s also built his political brand on not being compromising, of being entirely values driven, and spending literally his entire political career in Congress being a critic of the Democratic Party that he chooses to not join- for compromising, making deals, and getting to concrete plans in the end that are not always perfectly progressive. I either have to believe that he’s not serious, and won’t get things he proposes done (on purpose) to play politics, or that he’ll fail because he has no clue how to actually govern, or in the best case scenario, that he’ll be totally hypocritical in his process arguments, and will make deals and play politics with the best of them.

So no, if you’re proposing any form of expanding access to health care through government action, this tax bill is not helpful. The temporary and small middle-class tax cuts in it are not worth the damage they’ll do, especially because having less tax brackets now will make it harder to change tax law in the future. There, I said it for him, just in case you didn’t think he was playing politics like everyone else.